NAT
India-Arts/Culture/Education
Haryana
Arts and humanities education in India is still confined to parochial modules of subject-oriented study that does not allow cross-academic exchanges or liberal osmosis of multi-disciplines in the curriculum for students to develop a holistic intellectual grounding in the sphere of higher education, C. Raj Kumar, the founding vice-chancellor of the OP Jindal Global University said.
Arts and humanities education in India is still confined to parochial modules of subject-oriented study that does not allow cross-academic exchanges or liberal osmosis of multi-disciplines in the curriculum for students to develop a holistic intellectual grounding in the sphere of higher education, C. Raj Kumar, the founding vice-chancellor of the OP Jindal Global University said.
“First of
all, our academic programmes and degrees forcing a single discipline need for specialization
that was built early on affects holistic education. Education patterns have
change. Institutes of arts must learn to engage with society – past, present
and the future — sociology, history, science and math into one holistic
knowledge system. Liberal arts tries to help develop the innate qualities of
the human minds – develop a sense of identity in people and give them an
inkling of the role they are expected to play in the society,” C. Raj Kumar told
this writer at a seminar on higher liberal arts education at the university’s
JIndal School of Liberal Arts and Humanities in Sonepat in Haryana. The university
is a social corporate responsibility initiative by the Jindal industry
conglomerate together with foreign education partners.
Built as an
international centre for learning, the liberal arts school will offer dual
degree to students in collaboration with the Rollins College in Florida in US. It
will open its first academic session in August 2014 for an inter-disciplinary
undergraduate degree programme. Students will spend two years at Rollins after an
initial beginner’s tenure at the university in Haryana, the vice-chancellor
said.
The vice-chancellor
said the aim of the liberal arts school is to break down disciplinary boundaries
in education and “redefine what it means to study what it means to study the
arts and humanities in the international context”. Placements for students across
the continents may be the primary motivation of the university, but the greater
objective is to equip the students with tools of free-thinking intellectual progress
in a globalised knowledge milieu.
The liberal
arts learning centre claims that it trains students in “intellectual mastery,
democratic participation, self-expression and advanced life-long learning”.
A good liberal
arts education should not only promote knowledge and holistic intellectual
growth, “it engages with skills relating to advocacy and communication skills, “
C. Raj Kumar said. In our country, education is still very subjective and often
ends up “promoting mediocrity” and “rote knowledge of a discipline”. “A good liberal
arts education tries to put together all round knowledge for students to become
enlightened individuals – who are integrated into the broader societal intellect,”
vice-chancellor C. Raj Kumar, an alumnus of Harvard School in US and Oxford University
in UK, explained.
Liberal arts
do not tend to bracket students into disciplines so that students find clarity
of thought in their choices of professions later in life to suit “their community’s
and personal goals- and aspirations”, the vice-chancellor said. The university affirms
its commitment to its objective of “free intellectual growth” in all its five schools
of learning that include law, business,
governance and public policy and liberal arts in its campus amenities.
A guided
tour by C. Raj Kumar around the campus last week to a select group of academics,
professionals and journalists threw up surprises in lay out, smart class rooms with
hi-tech study networks, a moot court, sprawling libraries – both physical and
digital — and an international study room that doubles as a world flag room. National
flags of all the countries around the globe with which India shares diplomatic
ties flutter in a riot of colours. The flag room is the brainchild of
founder-director of the university Navin Jindal, an industrialist and young
politico, who fought a court battle to victory over the right to unfurl the
national flag in a public place, the vice-chancellor said.
The
vice-chancellor said the university works on four vital premises — inter-disciplinary
education, transnational humanity framework, skill development framework and professional
development network. “If you do not have all these, as an university, you
remain inadequately equipped,” C. Raj Kumar said. “We try to leverage the
125-year-old history of the Rollins College in US and harness its strengths for
our students,” he pointed out — suggesting that “collaborative higher education
with international partners was the future of advance learning in India”.
He explained
that technology and Internet had made it easy for students and faculty to
exchange with partners abroad.
The opulent
university— with language learning rooms, international lounges, a 100-acre
landscaped campus and futuristic buildings nestled in the green countryside of
Sonepat — brings the a silent debate in the educational fraternity in India to
the fore. Is higher education becoming a private enterprise like all other
industries in India, drifting from the monolithic government run “edifices” of
learning like temples to smart universities sponsored by powerful private
players.
The vice-chancellor
says the founder-director earmarked Rs 500 crore as capital investment when the
foundation of the university was laid in 2007-2008- and became operational with
the law school in 2009. “We face a revenue deficit of nearly Rs 10 crore every
year. Nearly 70 per cent of our students study on scholarship. We do not make
it an enterprise for profit,” the vice-chancellor said— citing examples of the
Shiv Nader and Azim Premji centres of higher learning. The university has a
little more than 3,000 students- with an official faculty and student ratio of
1: 15.
Professors
for Yale and Harvard sit on the university board to “mobilize international
admission”. A private university cannot work on quality, experiment with
learning modules – because “it has
independence of operation”, the vice-chancellor hinted with a smile ushering this
writer to a spicy Harayanvi (native of Haryana) lunch at the student’s spacious
dining room.
---
Madhusree Chatterjee
No comments:
Post a Comment